Saturday, September 14, 2013

Real-life questions about praying at the games

(This is my column in the Sept. 11 edition of The Anderson News. Quick background: the local football coaching staff was advised they could no longer be around during organized prayers following games or practices, even though they did not lead in them. The community of Lawrenceburg, Ky. was furious.   Here is my take on it.)

I have to make this column fit into about 650 words.

I could probably use 6,500. Or more.

In my 28-plus years of getting paid to write, I don't think I have ever seen a local display of pure emotion, of such anger, such frustration as I have seen around Lawrenceburg since the news broke last Wednesday that the Anderson County High School football coach Mark Peach and his coaching staff could no longer pray with the Bearcat team.

This is not simply an on-field disappointment. Those hurt for a few hours, maybe even a few days, but eventually all is fine and you just try to get better.

But to those who hold their religious faith close to their heart and wear it on their sleeve, this is about real life. It's more than stopping an opponent on fourth-and-1 inside the 10-yard-line and the outrage that many have expressed is understandable.

I believe the outrage is warranted. To whom it should be directed, however, is not clear.

I also know there are some who disagree, who feel the anger and frustration are misguided and that the decision to keep the coaching staff out of the team prayers was a good one.

Some thoughts...

First, Anderson County school superintendent Sheila Mitchell was caught in a no-win situation in this matter. She, like many other school districts in Kentucky, have received threats of litigation from the American Civil Liberties Union over the practice of the Gideons distributing Bibles in schools. The next obvious step would deal with prayers, even if they are student-led, when school personnel are present in official capacities.

Since Peach learned he would have to step away from his team's prayers or simply offer a moment of silence, there are many that are ready to fight the ACLU and stand up for what they believe to be their First Amendment rights. To do so would probably be a politically popular move.

However, a fight invites more litigation, which means thousands, maybe even millions of dollars in legal fees. Mitchell's decision, while not popular, was undoubtedly made with this in mind.

Secondly, the First Amendment says that government shall not establish religion, nor prohibit the free exercise thereof. I have been to every game Mark Peach has coached at Anderson County. While there is little doubt about his Christian world view, I have never seen him push his faith on anyone. For that matter, I have never seen him offer a prayer.

How a generic prayer is establishing religion is beyond me. The coaches are not coming around on Sunday and rounding up kids to go to church with them. They are not saying a kid must attend church to play linebacker. Are the coaches' rights being violated? I don't have the answer, but it is worth looking into.

Thirdly, kids have not been denied the right to pray. If a kid wants to pray and the desire was not the idea of a teacher, the kid can pray. Even the ACLU agrees on that.

Fourth, to make an issue of the way one prays is just sad. No other words are necessary.

Finally, the ACLU and similar groups like to use “tolerance” as a buzz word. Leslie Sparrow, of Anderson County, dropped me a note after Friday's game, asking the questions many are asking.

“Since when did tolerance become a one way street?” she wrote. “My kids have to be 'tolerant' of the kids they sit next to in class who refuse to stand for the flag because that is their 'right.' … When teachers speak of 'being made of stardust', my kids must be 'tolerant' and sit quietly. Oh, the list could continue. Where are my kids' rights? Who is 'tolerant' of their beliefs and allows them to express it?”

It's a question many want to ask when it seems like those who preach “tolerance” define that as simply agreeing with their positions.